2025 model year · Australian 4x4 wagons

Ford Everest vs Mitsubishi Pajero Sport

The Everest tows 3,500 kg, the Pajero Sport 3,100 kg. Ground clearance reaches 229 mm on the Everest and 218 mm on the Pajero Sport. Ford Everest and Mitsubishi Pajero Sport side by side, 2025 model year, from the makers’ own documents.

This page compares the 2025 Ford Everest (Everest U704, 2022–present) and 2025 Mitsubishi Pajero Sport (Pajero Sport QE/QF, 2015–present): the newest model year in which both have maker figures, in AU-market units. Newer model years in our data (Everest 2026) have too few maker figures to compare, so the page uses the newest year in which both have enough.

Max towing
3,500 kg vs 3,100 kg
Max payload
717 kg vs 695 kg
Ground clearance
229 mm vs 218 mm
Curb weight
2,383 kg vs 2,130 kg

01 / Verdict

Everest or Pajero Sport: who leads on what

Each line is the maker’s top figure for each model across its configurations. A lead is on that best configuration, so it depends on cab, bed, engine, axle and options; the closest matching trucks are compared below. Only a maker’s own figure decides a lead.

Towing and GCWR
The Everest tows 3,500 kg, the Pajero Sport 3,100 kg. The Everest leads by 400 kg on its best configuration.
Payload and GVWR
The Everest carries 717 kg of payload, the Pajero Sport 695 kg. The Everest leads by 22 kg on its best configuration.
Ground clearance and angles
The Everest has 229 mm of ground clearance, the Pajero Sport 218 mm. The Everest leads by 11 mm on its best configuration. At the best configuration: approach angle Everest 30.4°, Pajero Sport 30.0°; breakover angle Everest 22.2°, Pajero Sport 23.1°; departure angle Everest 25.3°, Pajero Sport 24.2°.
Dimensions
Length: Everest 4914 mm, Pajero Sport 4840 mm; width: Everest 1923 mm, Pajero Sport 1815 mm; height: Everest 1841 mm, Pajero Sport 1835 mm; wheelbase: Everest 2900 mm, Pajero Sport 2800 mm.
Curb weight
Curb weight: Everest 2,383 kg, Pajero Sport 2,080–2,130 kg.
Tires
Factory tire sizes. Everest: not in our data. Pajero Sport: 265/60R18.
Fuel tank
Fuel tank: Everest 80 L, Pajero Sport 68 L.

02 / Side by side

Every figure, group by group

Each cell is the range across the maker’s 2025 configurations of that model, with the small number of the document it comes from. A figure that is an estimate, an owners’ report or a third-party figure wears its mark and never decides a lead; a group where one model has no maker figure says so.

Towing and GCWR

Makermetric units

Ford Everest and Mitsubishi Pajero Sport: towing and gcwr
FigureFord Everest2025Mitsubishi Pajero Sport2025Leads
Max towing3,500 kg source 13,100 kg source 2Everest +400 kg
GCWR6,250 kg source 15,565 kg source 2Everest +685 kg

“Not published”: the maker doesn’t print it. —: not in the documents we hold yet. Scroll the table sideways for every column.

Payload and GVWR

Makermetric units

Ford Everest and Mitsubishi Pajero Sport: payload and gvwr
FigureFord Everest2025Mitsubishi Pajero Sport2025Leads
Max payload717 kg source 1645–695 kg source 2Everest +22 kg
GVWR3,100 kg source 12,775 kg source 2Everest +325 kg at the top

“Not published”: the maker doesn’t print it. —: not in the documents we hold yet. Scroll the table sideways for every column.

Ground clearance and angles

Makermetric units

Ford Everest and Mitsubishi Pajero Sport: ground clearance and angles
FigureFord Everest2025Mitsubishi Pajero Sport2025Leads
Ground clearance229 mm source 1218 mm source 2Everest +11 mm
Approach angle30.4° source 130.0° source 2Everest +0.4°
Breakover angle22.2° source 123.1° source 2Pajero Sport +0.9°
Departure angle25.3° source 124.2° source 2Everest +1.1°

“Not published”: the maker doesn’t print it. —: not in the documents we hold yet. Scroll the table sideways for every column.

Dimensions

Makermetric units

Ford Everest and Mitsubishi Pajero Sport: dimensions
FigureFord Everest2025Mitsubishi Pajero Sport2025Leads
Length4914 mm source 14840 mm source 2Everest +74 mm at the top
Width1923 mm source 11815 mm source 2Everest +108 mm at the top
Height1841 mm source 11835 mm source 2Everest +6 mm at the top
Wheelbase2900 mm source 12800 mm source 2Everest +100 mm at the top

“Not published”: the maker doesn’t print it. —: not in the documents we hold yet. Scroll the table sideways for every column.

Curb weight

Makermetric units

Ford Everest and Mitsubishi Pajero Sport: curb weight
FigureFord Everest2025Mitsubishi Pajero Sport2025Leads
Curb weight2,383 kg source 12,080–2,130 kg source 2Everest +253 kg at the top

“Not published”: the maker doesn’t print it. —: not in the documents we hold yet. Scroll the table sideways for every column.

Tires

Makermetric units

Ford Everest and Mitsubishi Pajero Sport: tires
FigureFord Everest2025Mitsubishi Pajero Sport2025Leads
Factory tire sizes255/65R18 source 3third-party265/60R18 source 2

No maker figure for the Everest in this group in our data, so it names no leader. “Not published”: the maker doesn’t print it. —: not in the documents we hold yet. Scroll the table sideways for every column.

Fuel tank

Makermetric units

Ford Everest and Mitsubishi Pajero Sport: fuel tank
FigureFord Everest2025Mitsubishi Pajero Sport2025Leads
Fuel tank80 L source 168 L source 2Everest +12 L at the top

“Not published”: the maker doesn’t print it. —: not in the documents we hold yet. Scroll the table sideways for every column.

Documents last checked . How we read them and what the marks mean: how we source the numbers. A figure doesn’t match its document? Report a wrong number.

03 / Like for like

The closest matching configurations

Ranges mix every cab, bed and engine. Here is one configuration of each, matched on the options that change the figures most, named as the maker names it.

Ford Everest
2025 Black Edition 2.0L Bi-Turbo 4WD
Mitsubishi Pajero Sport
2025 GLX 5 Seat 4WD 2.4L diesel 8-speed automatic
Ford Everest and Mitsubishi Pajero Sport, closest matching configurations
FigureEverestPajero SportLeads
Max towing3,500 kg source 13,100 kg source 2Everest +400 kg
GCWR6,250 kg source 15,565 kg source 2Everest +685 kg
Max payload717 kg source 1695 kg source 2Everest +22 kg
GVWR3,100 kg source 12,775 kg source 2Everest +325 kg
Ground clearance229 mm source 1218 mm source 2Everest +11 mm
Approach angle30.4° source 130.0° source 2Everest +0.4°
Breakover angle22.2° source 123.1° source 2Pajero Sport +0.9°
Departure angle25.3° source 124.2° source 2Everest +1.1°
Curb weight2,383 kg source 12,080 kg source 2Everest +303 kg
Length4914 mm source 14840 mm source 2Everest +74 mm
Wheelbase2900 mm source 12800 mm source 2Everest +100 mm
Factory tire sizes255/65R18 source 3third-party265/60R18 source 2
Fuel tank80 L source 168 L source 2Everest +12 L
  • Each is its model’s lowest trim with four-wheel drive (four doors where the data splits by body), with the first engine and gearbox the maker lists for it.
  • A figure marked “with” needs that factory package; one without is the configuration as it comes.

04 / Top figures

Which configuration earns each top figure

The leads above are between each model’s best configuration. Here is which configuration that is, and the factory package it needs.

Ford Everest

  • Max towing 3,500 kg: Black Edition 2.0L Bi-Turbo 4WD
  • GCWR 6,250 kg: Black Edition 2.0L Bi-Turbo 4WD
  • Max payload 717 kg: Black Edition 2.0L Bi-Turbo 4WD
  • Ground clearance 229 mm: Black Edition 2.0L Bi-Turbo 4WD
  • Approach angle 30.4°: Black Edition 2.0L Bi-Turbo 4WD
  • Breakover angle 22.2°: Black Edition 2.0L Bi-Turbo 4WD
  • Departure angle 25.3°: Black Edition 2.0L Bi-Turbo 4WD

Mitsubishi Pajero Sport

  • Max towing 3,100 kg: GLX 5 Seat 4WD 2.4L diesel 8-speed automatic
  • GCWR 5,565 kg: GLX 5 Seat 4WD 2.4L diesel 8-speed automatic
  • Max payload 695 kg: GLX 5 Seat 4WD 2.4L diesel 8-speed automatic
  • Ground clearance 218 mm: GLX 5 Seat 4WD 2.4L diesel 8-speed automatic
  • Approach angle 30.0°: GLX 5 Seat 4WD 2.4L diesel 8-speed automatic
  • Breakover angle 23.1°: GLX 5 Seat 4WD 2.4L diesel 8-speed automatic
  • Departure angle 24.2°: GLX 5 Seat 4WD 2.4L diesel 8-speed automatic

05 / Keep going

Both models, and other matchups

All vehicle comparisons · Rankings · How we source the numbers

06 / FAQ

Questions people ask

Which tows more, the Everest or the Pajero Sport?

The Everest tows 3,500 kg, the Pajero Sport 3,100 kg. The Everest leads by 400 kg on its best configuration. This is the maker’s top figure for each model across its 2025 configurations; what a given truck can do depends on its cab, bed, engine, axle and options.

Which has more payload, the Everest or the Pajero Sport?

The Everest carries 717 kg of payload, the Pajero Sport 695 kg. The Everest leads by 22 kg on its best configuration. This is the maker’s top figure for each model across its 2025 configurations; what a given truck can do depends on its cab, bed, engine, axle and options.

Which has more ground clearance, the Everest or the Pajero Sport?

The Everest has 229 mm of ground clearance, the Pajero Sport 218 mm. The Everest leads by 11 mm on its best configuration. This is the maker’s top figure for each model across its 2025 configurations; what a given truck can do depends on its cab, bed, engine, axle and options.

How do the Everest and the Pajero Sport compare in size?

Length: Everest 4914 mm, Pajero Sport 4840 mm; wheelbase: Everest 2900 mm, Pajero Sport 2800 mm. The range runs across cab, bed and wheelbase choices.

Which model years does this Everest vs Pajero Sport comparison use?

This page compares the 2025 Ford Everest (Everest U704, 2022–present) and 2025 Mitsubishi Pajero Sport (Pajero Sport QE/QF, 2015–present): the newest model year in which both have maker figures, in AU-market units. Newer model years in our data (Everest 2026) have too few maker figures to compare, so the page uses the newest year in which both have enough.