2025 model year · Australian utes
Mitsubishi Triton vs Toyota LandCruiser 70
The Triton tows 3,500 kg, the LandCruiser 70 3,500 kg. Ground clearance reaches 228 mm on the Triton and ≈330 mm on the LandCruiser 70. Mitsubishi Triton and Toyota LandCruiser 70 side by side, 2025 model year, from the makers’ own documents.
This page compares the 2025 Mitsubishi Triton (Triton MV, 2024–present) and 2025 Toyota LandCruiser 70 (LandCruiser 70 J70, 1984–present): the newest model year in which both have maker figures, in AU-market units. Newer model years in our data (Triton 2026) have too few maker figures to compare, so the page uses the newest year in which both have enough.
- Max towing
- 3,500 kg vs 3,500 kg
- Ground clearance
- 228 mm vs ≈330 mm
- Curb weight
- 2,170 kg vs 2,240 kg
01 / Verdict
Triton or LandCruiser 70: who leads on what
- Towing and GCWR
- The Triton tows 3,500 kg, the LandCruiser 70 3,500 kg. They tie on their best configuration.
- Payload and GVWR
- Only the Triton has a payload figure in our data: it carries 1,335 kg of payload. The LandCruiser 70 has none, so no leader is named.
- Ground clearance and angles
- The Triton has 228 mm of ground clearance, the LandCruiser 70 ≈330 mm. The LandCruiser 70 leads by 102 mm on its best configuration. At the best configuration: approach angle Triton 30.4°, LandCruiser 70 not in our data; breakover angle Triton 23.6°, LandCruiser 70 not in our data; departure angle Triton 22.8°, LandCruiser 70 not in our data.
- Dimensions
- Length: Triton 5320 mm, LandCruiser 70 ≈4865–5245 mm; width: Triton 1865 mm, LandCruiser 70 ≈1790–1870 mm; height: Triton 1785–1815 mm, LandCruiser 70 ≈1940–2115 mm; wheelbase: Triton 3130 mm, LandCruiser 70 ≈2730–3180 mm.
- Curb weight
- Curb weight: Triton 1,756–2,170 kg, LandCruiser 70 2,185–2,240 kg.
- Tires
- Factory tire sizes. Triton: 265/65R17, 265/60R18. LandCruiser 70: not in our data.
- Fuel tank
- Fuel tank: Triton 75 L, LandCruiser 70 130–180 L.
02 / Side by side
Every figure, group by group
Towing and GCWR
| Figure | Mitsubishi Triton2025 | Toyota LandCruiser 702025 | Leads |
|---|---|---|---|
| Max towing | 3,500 kg source 1 | 3,500 kg source 2 | Tie |
| GCWR | 6,210–6,250 kg source 1 | ≈7,010 kg source 2 | LandCruiser 70 +760 kg |
Payload and GVWR
| Figure | Mitsubishi Triton2025 | Toyota LandCruiser 702025 | Leads |
|---|---|---|---|
| Max payload | 910–1,335 kg source 1 | Not published | no maker figure for one |
| GVWR | 3,070–3,200 kg source 1 | ≈3,510 kg source 2 | LandCruiser 70 +310 kg at the top |
Ground clearance and angles
| Figure | Mitsubishi Triton2025 | Toyota LandCruiser 702025 | Leads |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ground clearance | 228 mm source 1 | ≈290–330 mm source 2 | LandCruiser 70 +102 mm |
| Approach angle | 30.0–30.4° source 1 | 33.0° source 3third-party1 of 15 configs | not the maker’s figure |
| Breakover angle | 23.0–23.6° source 1 | not in our data | no maker figure for one |
| Departure angle | 22.8° source 17 of 17 configs | 23.0° source 3third-party1 of 15 configs | not the maker’s figure |
Dimensions
| Figure | Mitsubishi Triton2025 | Toyota LandCruiser 702025 | Leads |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 5320 mm source 17 of 17 configs | ≈4865–5245 mm source 2 | Triton +75 mm at the top |
| Width | 1865 mm source 1 | ≈1790–1870 mm source 2 | LandCruiser 70 +5 mm at the top |
| Height | 1785–1815 mm source 1 | ≈1940–2115 mm source 2 | LandCruiser 70 +300 mm at the top |
| Wheelbase | 3130 mm source 1 | ≈2730–3180 mm source 2 | LandCruiser 70 +50 mm at the top |
| Bed length | 1555–1860 mm source 16 of 17 configs | not in our data |
Curb weight
| Figure | Mitsubishi Triton2025 | Toyota LandCruiser 702025 | Leads |
|---|---|---|---|
| Curb weight | 1,756–2,170 kg source 1 | 2,185–2,240 kg source 21 of 15 configs | LandCruiser 70 +70 kg at the top |
Tires
| Figure | Mitsubishi Triton2025 | Toyota LandCruiser 702025 | Leads |
|---|---|---|---|
| Factory tire sizes | 265/65R17, 265/60R18 source 1 | 265/70R16 source 3third-party |
Fuel tank
| Figure | Mitsubishi Triton2025 | Toyota LandCruiser 702025 | Leads |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fuel tank | 75 L source 1 | 130–180 L source 2 | LandCruiser 70 +105 L at the top |
03 / Like for like
The closest matching configurations
- Mitsubishi Triton
- 2025 GLX Double Cab Cab Chassis 4WD 6-speed manual
- Toyota LandCruiser 70
- 2025 WorkMate Double-Cab Cab-Chassis manual
| Figure | Triton | LandCruiser 70 | Leads |
|---|---|---|---|
| Max towing | 3,500 kg source 1 | 3,500 kg source 2 | Tie |
| GCWR | 6,250 kg source 1 | ≈7,010 kg source 2 | LandCruiser 70 +760 kg |
| Max payload | 1,197 kg source 1 | Not published | no maker figure for one |
| GVWR | 3,200 kg source 1 | ≈3,510 kg source 2 | LandCruiser 70 +310 kg |
| Ground clearance | 228 mm source 1 | ≈317 mm source 2 | LandCruiser 70 +89 mm |
| Approach angle | 30.4° source 1 | not in our data | no maker figure for one |
| Breakover angle | 23.4° source 1 | not in our data | no maker figure for one |
| Curb weight | 2,003 kg source 1 | ≈2,200 kg source 2 | LandCruiser 70 +197 kg |
| Length | not in our data | ≈5235 mm source 2 | |
| Wheelbase | 3130 mm source 1 | ≈3180 mm source 2 | LandCruiser 70 +50 mm |
| Factory tire sizes | 265/65R17 source 1 | not in our data | |
| Fuel tank | 75 L source 1 | 130 L source 2 | LandCruiser 70 +55 L |
04 / Top figures
Which configuration earns each top figure
Mitsubishi Triton
- Max towing 3,500 kg: GLX Single Cab Cab Chassis 2WD 6-speed manual
- GCWR 6,250 kg: GLX Single Cab Cab Chassis 4WD 6-speed manual
- Ground clearance 228 mm: GLX Single Cab Cab Chassis 2WD 6-speed manual
Toyota LandCruiser 70
- Max towing 3,500 kg: WorkMate Single-Cab Cab-Chassis automatic
- GCWR ≈7,010 kg: WorkMate Single-Cab Cab-Chassis automatic
- Ground clearance ≈330 mm: WorkMate Single-Cab Cab-Chassis automatic
05 / Keep going
Both models, and other matchups
06 / FAQ
Questions people ask
Which tows more, the Triton or the LandCruiser 70?
The Triton tows 3,500 kg, the LandCruiser 70 3,500 kg. They tie on their best configuration. This is the maker’s top figure for each model across its 2025 configurations; what a given truck can do depends on its cab, bed, engine, axle and options.
Which has more payload, the Triton or the LandCruiser 70?
Only the Triton has a payload figure in our data: it carries 1,335 kg of payload. The LandCruiser 70 has none, so no leader is named. This is the maker’s top figure for each model across its 2025 configurations; what a given truck can do depends on its cab, bed, engine, axle and options.
Which has more ground clearance, the Triton or the LandCruiser 70?
The Triton has 228 mm of ground clearance, the LandCruiser 70 ≈330 mm. The LandCruiser 70 leads by 102 mm on its best configuration. This is the maker’s top figure for each model across its 2025 configurations; what a given truck can do depends on its cab, bed, engine, axle and options.
How do the Triton and the LandCruiser 70 compare in size?
Length: Triton 5320 mm, LandCruiser 70 ≈4865–5245 mm; wheelbase: Triton 3130 mm, LandCruiser 70 ≈2730–3180 mm. The range runs across cab, bed and wheelbase choices.
Which model years does this Triton vs LandCruiser 70 comparison use?
This page compares the 2025 Mitsubishi Triton (Triton MV, 2024–present) and 2025 Toyota LandCruiser 70 (LandCruiser 70 J70, 1984–present): the newest model year in which both have maker figures, in AU-market units. Newer model years in our data (Triton 2026) have too few maker figures to compare, so the page uses the newest year in which both have enough.